Last month I posted here about Barbara McClintock's presentation at UConn on the imbalance between the number of women illustrators in children's publishing and the number of women who win the Caldecott Medal. They dominate the profession but have only won 22% of the Medals, according to McClintock's figures.
Today author Laurel Snyder has a post at her blog relating to the Goodreads Best Picture Book of 2013 nominees, which are almost all written by men. (In defense of the list, this is the final round. There were more titles originally, though I have no idea how well women were represented.) She points out that the Goodreads' final round list was made by Goodreads' readers (after voting on that earlier list.) The earlier list that the final round list came from may have been determined through some kind of popularity figures available to Goodreads from its readers.
Laurel asks, "WHAT’S GOING ON? Do men actually just make better picture books than women? Do men get
better marketing and publicity budgets than women for picture books?
Or… as I’m beginning to fear… do we, the (largely) women who buy and
blog about picture books have a tendency to elevate books by men?"
She then lists picture books published by women this past year, recommended to her by readers posting in comments.
If you are a children's litblogger who belongs to the Kidlitosphere community, that group has been discussing this issue today at its listserv.